User agent detail

Mozilla/4.01 (Compatible; Acorn Phoenix 2.08 [intermediate]; RISC OS 4.39) Acorn-HTTP/0.84
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-riscos.yaml
Acorn Browse 2.08RISC OS 4.39 desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Acorn Browse 2.08closeRISC OS 4.39desktop-browsercloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Phoenix RISC OS 4.39yes0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Phoenix 0.84close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Phoenix closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Acorn Browse 2.08 RISC OS 4.39desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:17 | by ThaDafinser