User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; zh-CN; rv:1.9.2.8) Firefox/3.6.8/Nutch-1.7
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/Parser/fixtures/bots.yml
Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake FirefoxBot/Crawler0.049 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.6.8closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mozilla rv:1.9.2.8closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.17902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesNutch-based Botcrawler0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.6.8/Nutch-1.7closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesNutchclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.6.8closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.11601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.6.8 Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesApache Nutchclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.6.8closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:16 | by ThaDafinser