User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 7_0_2 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/537.51.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/11A501 MicroMessenger/6.1.1 NetType/2G
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-587.php
WeChat App 6.1iOS 7.0unknown AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
WeChat App 6.1WebKit iOS 7.0AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 537.51.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeiOS 7.0.2AppleiPhonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
WeChat 6.1 iOS 7.0AppleiPhonesmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeiOS 7.0.2closeiPhonecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari UIWebView 7.0.2closeiOS 7.0.2AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS 7.0.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.05701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 537.51.1iOS 7.0.2AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.61606 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
WeChat 6.1.1Webkit 537.51.1iOS 7.0.2AppleiPhonemobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Webview closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:16 | by ThaDafinser