User agent detail

iRAPP/1.16.0 NokiaN95_8GB/31.0.015; Series60/3.1 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
iRAPP 1.16 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
iRAPP 1.16.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries60 3.1NokiaN95 8GBmobile-browseryescloseclose0.17702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia OSS Browser 3.1 Symbian OS Series 60 3.1NokiaN95smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser 31.0.015;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
iRAPP 1.16close NokiaN95_8GBcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 OSS 3.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.04801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser NokiaOS NokiaNokia N95closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series60 3.1NokiaN95 8GBmobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 5.0NokiaFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:16 | by ThaDafinser