User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Dragon/44.5.7.268 Chrome/44.0.2403.125 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-814.php
Dragon 44.5Win8.1 6.3unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dragon 44.5Blink Win8.1 6.3Windows DesktopDesktop0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.125closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 44.0.2403.125closeWindows 6.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 44.0Blink Windows 8.1desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.125closeWindows 8.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 44.0.2403closeWindows 8.1 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 44.0.2403.125closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 44.0.2403.125WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Comodo Dragon 44.5Blink Windows 8.1desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.125closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 44.0.2403.125closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:16 | by ThaDafinser