User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; vivo Y11 Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.72 Mobile Safari/537.36 OPR/16.0.1212.63537
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
vivoY11 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 16.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 16.0.1212.63537closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 16.0.1212.63537closeAndroid 4.1.2VivoY11mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mobile 16.0Blink Android 4.1VivoVivo Y11smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 16.0.1212.63537closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 16.0.1212closeAndroid 4.1.2vivoY11closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 16.0.1212.63537WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 16.0Blink Android 4.1.2VivoY11mobile:smartyescloseclose0.04401 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 16.0.1212.63537closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 16closeAndroid 4.1VivoY11Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.059 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:16 | by ThaDafinser