User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; F-02F Build/V19R63A) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2214.109 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet.yml
Chrome 40.0.2214.109Android 4.2.2Blink FujitsuArrows Tab F-02Ftablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 40.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.109closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 40.0.2214.109closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.25503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 40.0Blink Android 4.2FujitsuArrows Tab F-02Ftabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.109closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 40.0.2214closeAndroid 4.2.2FujitsuF-02Fcloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 40.0.2214.109WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 40Blink Android 4.2.2FujitsuARROWS Tab F-02Ftabletyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.109closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 40closeAndroid 4.2FujitsuF-02FTabletyesyescloseclose0.206 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:16 | by ThaDafinser