User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; MPDC110 BT IPS Build/JRO03H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.166 Safari/537.36 OPR/20.0.1396.73172
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MpmanMPDC110 BT IPS Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 20.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.119 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 20.0.1396.73172closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 20.0.1396.73172closeAndroid 4.1.1GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 20.0Blink Android 4.1MpmanMPDC110 BT IPStabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 20.0.1396.73172closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 20.0.1396closeAndroid 4.1.1MpmanMPDC110 BT IPScloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 20.0.1396.73172WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 20.0Blink Android 4.1.1MpmanMPDC110 BTtabletyescloseclose0.04 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 20.0.1396.73172closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.068 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:16 | by ThaDafinser