User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; PI3210G Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.59 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-525.php
Chrome 31.0Android 4.2unknown PhilipsAmio7Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 31.0Blink Android 4.2PhilipsAmio7Tabletyesyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.30903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 31.0Blink Android 4.2tabletyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 31.0.1650closeAndroid 4.2.2PI3210Gcloseclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.59WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 31Blink Android 4.2.2PI3210Gtabletyescloseclose0.10401 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.063 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:16 | by ThaDafinser