User agent detail

MOT-A-1F/00.04 UP.Browser/4.1.27a1 UP.Link/5.1.2.12 (Google WAP Proxy/1.0)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaA-1F Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 MotorolaA-1FMobile Phoneyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-A-1F 00.04closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.27a1close Motorolai305mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 MotorolaAsmartphoneyes0.013 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 4.1.27close MotorolaA-1Fcloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.27a1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 4.1a1 MotorolaA-1Fmobile:featureyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Motorolai305Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.04 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:15 | by ThaDafinser