User agent detail

Sraf/3.0 (Linux i686 ; U; HbbTV/1.1.1 (+PVR+DL;NEXUS; TV44; sw1.0) CE-HTML/1.0 Config(L:eng,CC:DEU); en/de)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/other.yaml
NEXUSTV44television Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Sraf 3.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Seraphic Sraf 3.0close media-playercloseclose0.20802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
GNU/Linux VestelMB95tv0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeLinux NEXUSTV44closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.36704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Seraphic Sraf 3.0 NEXUSTV44televisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:15 | by ThaDafinser