User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 9_2 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/601.1.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) FxiOS/1.0.1 Mobile/13C5055d Safari/601.1.46
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-firefox-ios.yaml
Firefox 1.0.1iOS 9.2Webkit 601.1.46AppleiPadtabletyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox for iOS 1.0WebKit iOS AppleiPadTabletyesyes0.028 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 601.1.46closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeiOS 9.2AppleiPadmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox iOS 1.0WebKit iOS 9.2AppleiPadtabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeiOS 9.2closeiPadcloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox iOS 1.0.0closeiOS 9.2AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS 9.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mobile Safari WebKit 601.1.46iOS 9.2AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 1.0.1Webkit 601.1.46iOS 9.2AppleiPadtabletyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox on iOS 1closeiOS 9.2AppleiPadTabletyesyescloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:14 | by ThaDafinser