User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux; en-US) AppleWebKit/532.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Arora/0.10.2 Safari/532.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-082.php
Arora 0.10Linux unknownunknown unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Arora 0.10WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.031 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 532.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Arora 0.10.2closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.21102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Arora 0.10WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Arora 0.10.2closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Arora 0.10.2closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Arora 0.10.2WebKit 532.4Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Arora 0.10.2Webkit 532.4Linux desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:14 | by ThaDafinser