User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Superbird/32.0.1700.7 Chrome/32.0.1700.7 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-705.php
SuperBird 32.0Win7 6.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
SuperBird 32.0Blink Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.052 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.7closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Superbird 32.0.1700.7closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.24102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 32.0Blink Windows 7desktop0.013 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.7closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 32.0.1700closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 32.0.1700.7closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.05501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 32.0.1700.7WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Superbird 32.0Blink Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.7closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 32.0.1700.7closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:13 | by ThaDafinser