User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; IQ444 Quattro Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/32.0.1700.99 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
FlyIQ444 Quattro Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 32.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 32.0.1700.99closeAndroid 4.1.2GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 32.0Blink Android 4.1smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 32.0.1700closeAndroid 4.1.2FlyIQ444 Quattrocloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.10801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 32.0.1700.99WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 32Blink Android 4.1.2FlyIQ444 Diamondmobile:smartyescloseclose0.023 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.045 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:12 | by ThaDafinser