User agent detail

UCBrowserHD/2.2.1.335 CFNetwork/548.1.4 Darwin/11.0.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-651.php
UC Browser HD 2.2iOS 5.1unknown Applegeneral Mobile DeviceMobile Deviceyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser HD 2.2WebKit iOS 5.1AppleMobile Deviceyesyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCBrowserHD 2.2.1.335closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeiOS 5.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser iOS 5.1yes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork 548.1.4closeiOS 5.1Applecloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose2.86929 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser iOS 5.1mobile:smartyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 5.1closeiOS 5.1AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:11 | by ThaDafinser