User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; CrOS x86_64 5841.98.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/36.0.1985.143 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-498.php
Chrome 36.0ChromeOS unknownunknown unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 36.0Blink ChromeOS Linux DesktopDesktop0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.143closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 36.0.1985.143closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.21502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 36.0Blink Chrome OS 5841.98desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.143closeChrome OS 36.0.1985.143closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 36.0.1985closeChrome OS 5841.98.0closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 36.0.1985.143closeChrome OS 5841.98.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.07301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 36.0.1985.143WebKit 537.36ChromeOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 36Blink Chrome OS desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.143closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 36.0.1985.97closeWindows 8.1Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:11 | by ThaDafinser