User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; i-mobile i-note WiFi 9 Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.169 Safari/537.22
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
imobilei-note WiFi 9 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 25.0WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.169closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 25.0.1364.169closeAndroid 4.0.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.26503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 25.0WebKit Android 4.0i-mobilei-note WiFi 9tabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.169closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 25.0.1364closeAndroid 4.0.4imobilei-note WiFi 9closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.14402 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 25.0.1364.169WebKit 537.22Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 25Webkit 537.22Android 4.0.4i-Mobilei-Note 9tabletyescloseclose0.05601 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.169closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Tabletyesyescloseclose0.087 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:10 | by ThaDafinser