User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux mips) Presto/2.12.407 Version/12.50 , Vizio Co-Star LT/1.0.3T4 (Vizio, ISV-B11, wireless)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/browser-opera.yaml
Opera Devices 3.4 Presto 2.12.407VizioISV-B11 Smart TVtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.50Presto 2.12Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.80closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.50Presto GNU/Linux VizioE400tv0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.50 , Vizio Co-Star LT/1.0.3T4 (Vizio, ISV-B11, wireless)closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.50closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.50closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.09901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.50Presto 2.12.407Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 3.4Presto 2.12.407 VizioISV-B11 Smart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.50closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l HTCMDA Vario VFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:10 | by ThaDafinser