User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8_2) AppleWebKit/536.26.14 (KHTML, like Gecko)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
AppleMail 536.26.14 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Apple Mail 6.0WebKit MacOSX 10.8AppleMacintoshDesktop0.031 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 536.26.14closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Apple Mail closeOS X 10.8.2email-clientcloseclose0.28203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mac 10.8desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeOS X 10.8.2closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
AppleMail 536.26.14closeMac OS X 10.8.2closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeOS X 10.8.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.08101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 536.26.14Mac OS X 10.8.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 536.26.14OS X Mountain Lion 10.8desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:09 | by ThaDafinser