User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 1.6; zh-cn; Lenovo 3GW100 Build/Donut) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Lenovo3GW100 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 3.1WebKit Android 1.6Mobile Phoneyesyes0.026 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 3.1.2closeAndroid 1.6GenericAndroid 1.6mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 1.6Lenovo3GW100smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.1.2closeAndroid 1.6closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 1.6closeAndroid 1.6Lenovo3GW100closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 1.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.07801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 3.1.2WebKit 528.5Android 1.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 528.5Android 1.6LenovoLePhone 3GW100mobile:smartyescloseclose0.022 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 44closeAndroid 1.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.055 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:08 | by ThaDafinser