User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; BQS-4001 Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/42.0.2311.109 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Chrome 42.0Android 4.4unknown BQOxfordMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 42.0Blink Android 4.4BQOxfordMobile Phoneyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.109closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 42.0.2311.109closeAndroid 4.4.2GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.29603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 42.0Blink Android 4.4smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.109closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 42.0.2311closeAndroid 4.4.2BQS-4001closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.10801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 42.0.2311.109WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 42Blink Android 4.4.2BQS-4001mobile:smartyescloseclose0.08301 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.109closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.4BQBQS-4001Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.042 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:08 | by ThaDafinser