User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.3; ru-ru; chagall Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/534.30 ACHEETAHI/2100501074
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
CM Browser 0.0Android 4.0unknown PegatronChagallMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
CM Browser WebKit Android 4.0PegatronChagallMobile Phoneyesyes0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0.3PegatronChagallmobile-browseryescloseclose0.25102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.0yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.0.3closeAndroid 4.0.3chagallcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.07701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android 4.0.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.0.3PegatronChagalltabletyescloseclose0.025 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0PegatronChagallTabletyesyescloseclose0.045 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:07 | by ThaDafinser