User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.2; fr-fr; Android Edition StarTrail Build/FRF91) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-3.yml
Android Browser Android 2.2WebKit SFRStarTrailsmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.2GenericAndroid 2.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.2SFRStarTrailsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.2closeAndroid 2.2Android Edition StarTrailcloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid closecloseclosecloseclose0.07401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 533.1Android 2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:06 | by ThaDafinser