User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (MIDP-2.0; U; zh-CN; Lenovo A7600-H) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/3.4.3.532 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-732.php
UC Browser 3.4Android 4.2unknown LenovoA10-70 A7600 Wi-Fi + 3GTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 3.4U2 Android 4.2LenovoA10-70 A7600 Wi-Fi + 3GTabletyesyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close AISIris 800mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 3.4 LenovoA7600-Hsmartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 3.4.3close LenovoA7600-Hcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.04601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 3.4.3.532 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 3.4Gecko LenovoA7600-H) U2mobile:featureyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:06 | by ThaDafinser