User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.22; Mac_PowerPC)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-ie.yaml
Internet Explorer 5.2.2OS X Tasman desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 5.2Tasman MacOSX 10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.035 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 5.22closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 5.22closeMac OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 5.22Trident Mac desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 5.22close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 5.22closeMac OS closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 5.22closeMacintosh closecloseclosecloseclose0.05401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 5.22Trident Mac closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 5.2.2Tasman OS X desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.22closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:06 | by ThaDafinser