User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.19) Gecko/2010031218 FreeBSD/i386 Firefox/3.0.19,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
FreeBSD Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.0Gecko 1.9.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.177 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.0.19closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.0.19closeBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.29703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.0Gecko FreeBSD desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.0.19,gzip(gfecloseFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.0.19closeFreeBSD closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.0.19closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.06301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.0.19Gecko 2010031218Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.0.19Gecko 1.9.0FreeBSD desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.0.19closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:05 | by ThaDafinser