User agent detail

MOT-MT620_TD/1.0 OPhone/2.5 (Linux; Android 2.2) Release/03.31.2011 Browser/WAP2.0 (AppleWebKit/533.1) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaMT620_TD Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 533.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 2.2MotorolaMOTO MT620mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.2MotorolaMT620smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.2closeAndroid 2.2MotorolaMT620_TDcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit 533.1Android 2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.50405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.2MotorolaMOTO MT620mobile:smartyescloseclose0.023 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 2.2closeAndroid 2.2MotorolaMT620Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.059 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:04 | by ThaDafinser