User agent detail

SonyEricssonM608c/R100 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Symbian OS; 276) Opera 8.60 [en]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonM608c Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.60closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 8.60closeSymbian OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.19902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 8.60Presto Symbian OS Sony EricssonM608csmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 8.60close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 8.60closeSymbian OS SonyEricssonM608ccloseclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 8.60closeSymbian OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 8.60 Symbian Sony EricssonSony Ericsson M608ccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 8.60 Sony EricssonM608cmobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SonyEricssonM608cFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.033 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:04 | by ThaDafinser