User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.2; U; Series60/3.1 Samsung/SGH-i455/UMHA3 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 ) AppleWebKit/413 (KHTML, Like Gecko) Safari/413
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSGH-i455 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari SymbianOS Mobile Phoneyes0.041 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 413closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Nokia Web Browser closeSymbian OS 9.2SamsungSGH-i455mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia OSS Browser 3.1WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 3.1SamsungSGH-i455smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia OSS Browser 3.1closeSymbian OS 9.2SamsungSGH-i455closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 OSS 3.1closeSymbianOS 9.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser WebKit 413Symbian Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 413Series60 3.1Samsungi455mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 9.2SamsungSGH-i455Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:04 | by ThaDafinser