User agent detail

GoogleEarth/7.1.0003.1255(Android;Android (HTC Desire X-protou-user-4.1.1);de-DE;kml:2.2;client:Free;type:default)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCDesire X-protou-user-4.1.1 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGoogle BotBot/Crawler0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
GoogleEarth 7.1.0003.1255closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid HTCDesire Xmobile-browseryescloseclose0.28103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android HTCDesire X-protou-user-4smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid HTCDesire X-protou-user-4.1.1closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android HTC Desire Xcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Google Earth 7.1 Android 4.1.1HTCDesire Xmobile:smartyescloseclose0.03 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.047 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:04 | by ThaDafinser