User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.1; Lenovo A830 Build/JOP40D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.59 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LenovoA830 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 29.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.125 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.59closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 29.0.1547.59closeAndroid 4.2.1LenovoA830mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 29.0Blink Android 4.2LenovoA830smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.59closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 29.0.1547closeAndroid 4.2.1LenovoA830closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 29.0.1547.59WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 29Blink Android 4.2.1LenovoA830mobile:smartyescloseclose0.023 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.59closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 29closeAndroid 4.2LenovoA830Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.092 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:04 | by ThaDafinser