User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; Windows NT 6.2; Trident/6.0) BingPreview/1.0b
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-492.php
yesBingPreviewBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesBingPreviewBot/Crawler0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 10.0closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesBingBotSearch bot0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
BingPreview 1.0closeWindows 8 closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 10.0closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
BingPreview 1.0bTrident 6.0Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesBing Previewclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:04 | by ThaDafinser