User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; en-us; GT-I9082) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/9.4.0.347 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-I9082 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.4U3 Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.055 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.17702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.4WebKit Android 4.2SamsungGALAXY Grand Duosphabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2SamsungGT-I9082closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.4.0.347WebKit 533.1Android 4.2.2Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.4Webkit 533.1Android 4.2.2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2SamsungGT-I9082Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.036 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:03 | by ThaDafinser