User agent detail

PhilipsX623 MAUI/10A1032MP_ASTRO_W1052 Release/31.12.2010 Browser/Opera Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Sync/SyncClient1.1 Opera/9.80 (MTK; Nucleus; Opera Mobi/4000; U; ru-RU) Presto/2.5.28 Version/10.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PhilipsX623 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 10.10Presto 2.2Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.031 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 10.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 10.10close Philips3200mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mobile 10.10Presto MTK / Nucleus PhilipsX623smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 10.10close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 10.10close PhilipsX623closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mobile 10.10close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 10.10Presto 2.5.28 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 10.10Presto 2.5.28MRE PhilipsX623mobile:featureyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 10.10closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
MAUI Browser close Philips3200Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.033 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:02 | by ThaDafinser