User agent detail

Mozilla 5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.2.3; zh-cn; SCH-i809 Build FROYO) UC AppleWebKit 534.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile Safari 534.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSCH-i809 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake BrowserBot/Crawler0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeAndroid 2.2.3GenericAndroid 2.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.2SamsungSCH-i809smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.2.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.2.3closeAndroid 2.2.3SamsungSCH-i809closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.2.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.05701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit Android 2.2.3Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser Android 2.2.3SamsungGalaxy Smobile:smartyescloseclose0.03 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.055 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:02 | by ThaDafinser