User agent detail

24.0.1284.0.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/534.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/24.0.1284.0.3.742.2 Safari/534.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-821.php
yesFake ChromeBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake ChromeBot/Crawler0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 24.0.1284.0.3.742.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 24.0.1284.0.3.742.2closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 24.0WebKit Windows 7desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 24.0.1284.0.3.742.2closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 24.0.1284closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 24.0.1284.0.3.742.2closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 24.0.1284.0.3.742.2WebKit 534.7Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 24.0.1284.0Webkit 534.7Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 24.0.1284.0.3.742.2closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 24.0.1312.52closeUnknown Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:00 | by ThaDafinser