User agent detail

Dalvik/1.4.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.6; GT-I9100G Build/GINGERBREAD)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-000-mobiles.php
Dalvik 1.4Android 2.3unknown SamsungGalaxy S IIMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dalvik 1.4WebKit Android 2.3SamsungGalaxy S IIMobile Phoneyesyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Dalvik 1.4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 2.3.6SamsungGalaxy S IImobile-browseryescloseclose0.26203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3SamsungGALAXY S IIsmartphoneyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.3.6closeAndroid 2.3.6SamsungGT-I9100Gcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android 2.3.6Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 2.3.6SamsungGalaxy S IImobile:smartyescloseclose0.032 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android App 2.3closeAndroid 2.3SamsungGT-I9100GSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:29:00 | by ThaDafinser