User agent detail

Mozilla/3.0(WILLCOM;KYOCERA/WX331K/2;1.0.8.13.000000/0.1/C100) Opera 7.2 EX
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/carrier-willcom.yaml
Opera Mobile 7.2 KyoceraWX331Kmobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 7.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 7.2close desktop-browsercloseclose0.17702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 7.2Presto KyoceraWX331Ksmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 7.2close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 7.2close closeclosecloseclose0.016 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 7.2close closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 7.2 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 7.2 KyoceraWX331Kmobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera WX331Kcloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 7.54closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:59 | by ThaDafinser