User agent detail

Mozilla 5.0 (Symbian/3; Series60/5.2 NokiaN8-00/00.0.000; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) AppleWebkit/525 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3 BrowserNG/7.3.1.8 3gpp-gba,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NokiaN8-00 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake BrowserBot/Crawler0.005 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebkit 525closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Nokia Web Browser closeSymbian OS Nokiamobile-browseryescloseclose0.22102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser 7.3WebKit Symbian^3 NokiaN8smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser 00.0.000;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Browser 7.3.1closeSymbian^3 NokiaN8-00closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 Nokia Browser 7.3.1.8closeSymbian closecloseclosecloseclose0.05701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser WebKit 525NokiaOS NokiaNokia N8-00closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Nokia Browser 7.3.1Webkit 525Series60 5.2NokiaN8-00mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 5.0NokiaFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:58 | by ThaDafinser