User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_9_1) AppleWebKit/537.73.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-317.php
Safari 0.0MacOSX 10.9unknown AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari WebKit MacOSX 10.9AppleMacintoshDesktop0.07 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 537.73.11closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari closeOS X 10.9.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.26503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mac 10.9desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeOS X 10.9.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
AppleMail 537.73.11closeMac OS X 10.9.1closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeOS X 10.9.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.05201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 537.73.11Mac OS X 10.9.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari Webkit 537.73.11OS X Mavericks 10.9desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:58 | by ThaDafinser