User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/14.0; Linux) KHTML/TDEHTML/14.0.1 (like Gecko) (Debian)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Konqueror 14.0Debian KHTML desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Konqueror 14.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Konqueror 14.0KHTML Debian desktop0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Konqueror 14.0;closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 14.0closeDebian closeclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Konqueror 14.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Konqueror 14.0 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Konqueror 14.0KHTML Debian desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:57 | by ThaDafinser