User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.5; zh-cn; HTC Incredible S with Beats Audio Build/Sense3.5 AnZhi WKNH) UC AppleWebKit/530+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile Safari/530
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCIncredible S with Beats Audio Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.028 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 530closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeAndroid 2.3.5GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.24902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3HTCIncredible S with Beats Audiosmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.3.5closeAndroid 2.3.5HTCIncredible S with Beats Audiocloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.11401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 530Android 2.3.5HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser Webkit 530Android 2.3.5HTCIncredible Smobile:smartyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.046 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:57 | by ThaDafinser