User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5b1; Mac_PowerPC)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-ie.yaml
Internet Explorer 5.5OS X Tasman desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 5.5Tasman MacPPC Windows DesktopDesktop0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 5.5b1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 5.5b1closeMac OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 5.5Trident Mac desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 5.5b1close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 5.5closeMac OS closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 5.5b1closeMacintosh closecloseclosecloseclose0.06701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 5.5b1Trident Mac closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 5.5Tasman OS X desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:56 | by ThaDafinser