User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; OpenSUSE 12.1; xx) Presto/2.10.229 Version/11.62
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Opera 11.62SUSE Presto 2.10.229desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 11.62Presto 2.10Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.62closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 11.62closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.17902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 11.62Presto GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.62closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 11.62closeSUSE closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 11.62closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 11.62Presto 2.10.229Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 11.62Presto 2.10.229SUSE desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.62closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux zvav Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:56 | by ThaDafinser