User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-492.php
IE 5.01Win2000 5.0unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 5.01Trident Win2000 5.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 5.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 5.01closeWindows 5.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 5.01Trident Windows 2000desktop0.013 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 5.01closeWindows 2000closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 5.1closeWindows 2000 closeclosecloseclose0.019 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 5.01closeWindows 2000 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 5.1Trident Windows Windows NT 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose3.41134 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 5.0.1 Windows 2000desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.01closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:55 | by ThaDafinser