User agent detail

NokiaX3-02i/5.0 (p) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/420+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/420+
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NokiaX3-02i Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 420closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 420close desktop-browsercloseclose0.24202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser WebKit Symbian NokiaX3-02ismartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 5.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser close NokiaX3-02icloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 420NokiaOS NokiaNokia X3-02icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 420Series40 NokiaX3-02mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo Q05Aclose Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:54 | by ThaDafinser