User agent detail

HbbTV/1.1.1 (;HyperPanel;EN2000 ;9.wk.92;4.4.2; ) LOH; Opera; CE-HTML/1.0 NetFrontNX/2.1 NETRANGEMMH based on WebKit
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/other.yaml
NetFront NX 2.1 HyperPanelEN2000television Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera CEcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront NXclose GenericSmartTVmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront NetFront LoeweSL150tv0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 1.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1close HyperPanelEN2000closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera close closecloseclosecloseclose0.10801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera WebKit closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront NX 2.1 HyperPanelEN2000televisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:54 | by ThaDafinser