User agent detail

iBrowser/2.5 (Nokia6124cEM52.01;SymbianOS/9.2 Series60/3.1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia6124cEM52 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.028 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
iBrowser 2.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Nokia Web Browser closeSymbian OS 9.2Nokiamobile-browseryescloseclose0.19902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IBrowse Symbian OS Series 60 3.1Nokia6124cEM52smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser 9.2closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
iBrowser 2.5closeSymbian OS 9.2Nokia6124cEM52closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 OSS 3.1closeSymbianOS 9.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.04801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
iBrowser 2.5 NokiaOS NokiaNokia 6124cEM52closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
iBrowser 2.5 Series60 3.1Nokia6124cEM52.01mobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SymbianOS closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 5.0NokiaFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:53 | by ThaDafinser