User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.149 Safari/537.36 OPR/20.0.1387.77
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 20.0Windows XPBlink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 20.0Blink WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 20.0.1387.77closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 20.0.1387.77closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 20.0Blink Windows XPdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 20.0.1387.77closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 20.0.1387closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.149closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.16902 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 20.0.1387.77WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.36804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 20.0Blink Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 20.0.1387.77closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 20.0.1387.37closeMac OS X 1091Desktopcloseclose0.053 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:53 | by ThaDafinser